The First Monster
We are all jaded. In
the beginning we wrinkled our nose, and couldn’t believe what we saw, or heard,
or read. We nodded our heads in
disapproval, and reminded ourselves how civilized we as a Western People truly
are. Than the more we walked the streets,
and looked, and listened……and participated, we began to understand. For
instance, the “C” word.
One begins to come around to the idea that Corrruption is
only a concept. It is only a bad thing
if you yourself have no opportunity to partake. It’s only bad if you don’t get any.
Then you begin to wonder if corruption isn’t so bad for the
economy after all. It greases the wheel
to the benefit of all. With Corruption
EVERYONE wins. The seller is
happy. The buyer is satisfied. The government is even content.
Now how is the government
content?
The aim of the government is to ensure you have the proper
environment for getting a job. How you
are compensated is up to you.
Yet after one is compensated the goal of the government is
than to ensure you spend as much of your money as possible. Because at the end of the DAY an economy is
only as successful as the amount of money it’s people is able to SPEND. And Government’s are judged and compared by
the success of their economy. It’s all
about the result and little about the means.
Right?
In this, the Gilded Age of Corruption within the Heavenly
Kingdom, we now see it as the norm, rather than the exception. Everyone partakes. Teachers, policeman, low level officials. The shock is gone. And once the shock is gone, our disgust
disappears as well. And then we forget
why we were even angry.
So it is easy to forget that once really not so long ago,
there was a Time when rules meant something in China. When arrogance, and a failing of the public
trust had repercussions, and the insensitivity of the government towards the people’s
expectations was not nearly as pervasive.
The story of Wang Shouxin is such a tale. Many adjectives could be used to describe
the Chinese in 1979. Jaded was not one
of them. Nor was mistrust of the government. China at the dawn of the Deng Xiaoping Era was
perhaps like America circa pre Vietnam 1964.
Willing to put it’s trust in government to do the right thing.
Wang Shouxin was executed in 1980 for stealing approx.
530,000 rmb. In today’s dollars that’s
$87k. However, if a more realistic black
mkt rate is factored in, the actual sum is surely much lower. In 1990 my peak rate was 14:1. Not even $40k usd. Yet her story was the most outrageously
documented incident of corruption up to then.
Further, she was initially only sentenced to prison, not to death. Only the dogged work and passion of a Chinese investigative
journalist named Liu Binyan managed to get the case reopened. Only then was she sentenced to death.
What was Woman Wang’s crime?
She overpriced the selling of coal, and pocketed the difference between
the State cost and her markup.
Simple. She didn’t drive a
car. Didn’t own a house. Didn’t have a passport. And she didn’t have anyone killed.
Such was the sense of perceived injustice at that time, and
the government’s harsh line on corruption, that the mere stealing of only $40,
000 could induce the government to sentence a person to death, to assuage the
anger of the Chinese masses.
The bar has risen since than.
Perhaps no metric tells more how China has changed since
1979.
When “Boss Railroad”, Liu Zhijun and his brother bring home an
estimated $50 million, and no one is executed, the story is complete. Liu Binyan was outraged enough to write a
book about Wang Shouxin, and her $40,000. People or Monsters. And his book had the desired effect.
She was executed.
When the “Boss Rail” story came out there was more curiosity
than disbelief. The sighs surely
drowned out the rage. People’s outrage
has been overcome by an acceptance of inevitability, followed by curiosity at the
size of the take. Some are hyprocritical. Those same people that feign disapproval themselves continue to participate in the
orgy lest one leave his own morsel on the table for someone else. No one
is to be executed. Even though he’s
admitted to having people killed. There will
certainly be no freewheeling books written about the sordid story of Liu
Zhijun.
Very good comment. One comment of my own in re the line that pre-Vietnam 1964 the American people were willing to put their trust in their government.
ReplyDeleteSome of us are still convinced that the trust was justified. The decisions made then were made with what we knew at the time, and with a frame of reference set in the 1940s and 50s. The mistake was in believing that there could be such a thing as limited war.
Beware of presumptions applies as much to your generation as it did to mine.