Why China Needs Mao Today
China needs Mao.
They need the Father of Modern China.
The Communist appeal in the 30’s had a lot to do with not
just the staggering disparity of wealth but by a country run not by Beijing,
but by local, brutal, ruthless chieftains whose main concern was the
consolidation of their power and wealth, at the expense of the people they
ruled. These leaders were uneducated,
peasants. China from the 20’s through
to the 40’s was nothing but an array of banana republics stitched together to
call itself one nation. China was a
farce and weak, and given only paper respect. No one feared China.
China is not “weak” today.
It is not a farce. It has nuclear
weapons. Countries may not “fear”
China, but they are certainly “leary” of the Heavenly Kingdom.
Yet Chinese society today is very much like China in the
30’s. Weak, in disarray, and without
purpose. Mistrust, and suspicion. Everyone is a thief, or purported to
be. There is no unity when everyone is out
for himself.
So China needs a unifying presence. Someone with the moral authority to kick ass
and get away with it. The only person
that could do this on force of will and personality alone is Mao.
Please don’t mention Zhou En Lai. He was too cultivated..
Deng Xiaoping….? Nope. In the end he depended upon his military friends just to come out of hiding in the 70’s. He was merely first among equals.
China needs a MAN that stands above everyone else. Uncouth, unkempt, coarse and vulgar.
Unless China finds such a person today, it will continue
down the slope of mass greed, and eternal suspicion where everyone is out for
himself, and takes what he can before the implosion.
Even if China found such a MAN, what than? The distrust of government is so steep, the population so desensitized to talk, and gestures, would he even be able to make a difference?
NO! of course not. Such a contemporary man today would himself be too tainted to clean things up. I honestly believe he would be removed from power before any progress was to actually happen. Such a person would maybe last 2 years in power.
So China needs to go to one of it’s ubiquitous soothsayers,
and see if any of them can bring the old man back. Let’s assume for the fun of it they would be
able to do just that.
Than what?
First of all, the Great Helmsman would be astounded by what
he sees. They say if George Washington
came back today and saw an airplane he’d promptly have a heart attack.
Mao would at first be utterly impressed with the undeniable
progress of China, amongst the world’s nations. He would marvel at the glass and steel, the
traffic jams and the large airports. In
his time, China was a bicycle nation, and nobody ever rode an airplane, much
less saw one flying.
It goes without saying he wouldn’t like the quality of the air.
The Great One would be amazed at the condition of the roads,
and the quality of housing, even in the countryside. He wouldn’t be fazed by the poverty in the
countryside either. Far more people
have a bowl of rice today than in his time, and famines are unheard of today.
If Mao were to come back from the land of Marx, and just
walk around for a few days, his joy and
pride in the progress of the motherland would surely turn to anger,
disillusionment and than rage.
In Mao’s day there really never was a vacuum of morality. Everyone believed in the Party. The Party was Big Brother, and joining the Party a priviledge. It was not a means to an end, ie a better apartment, or a means to more easily moving money abroad. It was a serious responsibility to be a Party member than. To many people, you were the ombudsman of your village. People actually came to you to settle disputes. The authority of Mao was a halo above your head.
Today Mao would see the opposite. He would see people becoming party members
as a conspiratorial way to enrich themselves.
Using their status as leverage to send their children abroad. Using their party card as a way to ensure
they received a cut of every investment deal that went down.
Than he would see the KTV’s, this form of prostitution with Chinese characteristics. He would wonder how these came about.
He would stroll through Macau, and wonder why so many
mainland officials are there, and oh my, how they have so much money!
He wouldn’t be upset at the quality of the food. The food quality was bad than, too. Nor the supposed shoddiness of the consumer
products being produced. He would even be impressed with the health
system.
No, what would set Mao off would be the utter wealth of the CCP elite. Once upon a time obscene wealth, legally gotten or not, was seen as a scourge of the West, and something China could live without. It was better to keep China down you see, and poor, than allow the reemergence of a “landowner” class.
It’s ironic that until the 80’s the CCP leadership did more to keep China down and underachieving than any country ever did. But they were on to something. Unleashing the natural instincts and business acumen of the Chinese people would bring rise to a prosperous class of the population that would someday challenge the power of the CCP within China. Hadn’t the Chinese migrated to neighboring countries and in no time promptly dominated those economies(see Malay, Indonesia, and the Philippines)? Better to simply bar people from becoming rich!
The outside world likes to say we need a “strong prosperous,
China!”. Or…
”Only a wealthy China can feel content to join the club of nations”
But what people don’t understand is that minus the controls
and checks and balances a properly capitalist and free economy places on a
growing society, that country will only grow in a wild and unpredictable
nature. Corruption will go unchecked. (
A Frankenstein economy will ensue, where a promising experiment goes wrong). Abuses will permeate the system, as it does
now.
However what the white guys in the suits meant was that we need a “strong, prosperous, China, where everyone shares in the prosperity and wealth”.
Only than can China be “normal”, and successfully join the
club of nations. And that is not what
we have now. And that is why China is
more a risk to itself, and to others rich, than it may have been poor.
And that’s why a wealthy China is scary. Wealthy does not strong, and viable a country make, if only a few share in the spoils.
No…wealth was a bad thing.
It may be great for the individual Chinese, but for the survival of the
country as a whole it can be terrible if not properly managed, and kept in
check. And while the country today is
infinitely better off today than it was in the time of Mao, as a whole, the
country than was far more unified, and less of a threat to the community. There
was never a real threat of implosion, as there increasingly seems to be today,
even when compared to the Cultural Revolution.
So if Mao were alive today he would start another cultural
revolution, a class war, and it would be wildly supported by the masses. In China people think “if I can’t have what
my neighbor has, than I want him to be as poor as me”. Problem
is the wildly, corrupt wealthy would simply be too numerous to count. The ill begotten gains of the Party Elite
too numerous to account for. There would
be an exodus unlike anything we’ve seen.
Both the corrupt and wealthy would flee en masse, with their new found
green cards and passports. They’ve
prepared for this you see, for a long time.
Their money is already overseas.
Their children are gone. These
are the same people that prop up real estate values in half of the subdivisions
in America today.
That mysterious family that suddenly arrives from Canada and
says “we’re in business” when asked their story. Speaking of which, housing
prices in China would go off a cliff, wiping out the paper wealth of tens of
millions of Chinese.
No matter. This would
only make housing more affordable, for all.
Yet the gap between rich and poor would disappear overnight. Only the poor and middle class would
remain. As for the party membership,
purges and executions would have a violent pace. Dunce caps would come out of the closet, and
property developers and those few industrialists remaining would wear them.
China would be a nation of one again. Only those without money enough or
connections would remain. Everyone would look around and see how everyone
is like them, and China would again become a nation content with itself.
I don't know how much you know about communism, but here's a speech from Deng:
ReplyDelete[FONT=Verdana]Chairman Mao's Culture Revolution was launched with the intent of preventing revisionism. His intent was good, but it was excessive. When did Comrade (Liu) Shaoqi and I say we wanted Capitalism? May it be the policy of "buying instead of producing, renting instead of buying" or cash bonus to productive workers, it is for the good of building Socialism. It will only make socialism flourish in China. What I say does not matter. Our practice will verify it. Shaoqi once said to me: "If my line does indeed lead China towards Capitalism, then I submit to the struggle waged against me by the masses". [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana]We fought so many battles. What we have today is achieved through the sacrifices of countless Martyrs. So many comrades died, and "long live Communism" were their last words. One of my fighters said to me before dying: "Commissar Deng, we must reach Communism!" I replied: "do not worry, I will make China prosperous". [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana]In a Politburo meeting criticizing [FONT=Verdana]Outlaws of the Marsh[/FONT] in 74', Jiang Qing (Mao's wife) said: "Deng Xiaoping, you are another Song Jiang (surrenderer). Chairman Mao led our Revolution to oppose Imperialism, but you are just waiting for the Chairman to pass away so you can surrender to Imperialism". Ridiculous! No, I will not! [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana]If in the future, we forsaken our friends in the Third World and collude with Imperialism, then our Reform has gone astray. If in the future, Imperialism gets to drops bombs at us, then our Reform has gone astray. If in the future agents of Imperialism run amok in our territory, then our Reform has gone astray. If one day the Americans betrays the Shanghai Communique and renews its support for Taiwan, then our reform has gone astray. But none of this will happen, our practice ensures it. [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana]The Reform is the only way forward, and there are two steps to it. First, return to the line we decided to take on the Eighth National People's Congress in 56', the one Comrade Shaoqi and I represented. Second, open up the country and welcome foreign investment. Some people fear this, but their fear is irrational. With Comrade Shaoqi's ideas and me in person, nothing will go wrong. [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana]Comrade Deng Liqun said he had a dream: he dreamed that China became filled with corrupt officials. Nonsense! Our cadres are all Communists that we hand-picked. Even if they do become somewhat bureaucratic, they will not be corrupted. Plus, don't we still have the police, the court and the law? If corruption does occur, then our Reform has gone astray. [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana]He said in his dream China will have a Bougeoisie. Impossible! We liquidated the Bourgeoisie as early as 1949. How can there be a place for the Bourgeosie in building Socialism? Didn’t we already go through class struggle? This is Culture Revolution's way of thinking! We should let a portion of people get rich, and they will help the people left behind---and finally all will be prosperous. Our kids received a communist education from start, they will help others. I don't doubt it! [/FONT]
Delete[FONT=Verdana]Deng Liqun also dreamed that China will have mafia and gangsterism. Ridiculous! Only Hong Kong and Taiwan has that. China does not have them now, nor will it have them in the future. If they do appear, then our reforms have gone astray. [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana]Comrade Deng Liqun also dreamed: the rich kills without punishment, and the poor has nowhere to complain; Party members become detached from the masses. Impossible! Our Party did detach itself from the masses during the Culture Revolution. Now that there is the Reform, our Party will only work better, and Party member will grow closer to the masses. Our practice ensures it. [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana]Comrade Deng Liqun also dreamed: workers get fired and laid off; the Capitalists come back and exploit them; peasants are driven off their land; the people suffer front and back. Is this not ridiculous? We are now faced with too many jobs and not enough workers. How can there be no land for the peasants when we need food so desperately? If that does occur, then our Reform has gone astray. [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana]Most laughable is that Comrade Deng Liqun dreamed of a China with prostitutes and STDs, in which poor parents are forced to send their daughters to suffer through a hellish life. The way I see it, Comrade Deng Liqun is being too harsh. Is it even possible that I can be worse than Chiang Kai-shek? The Party has already rid China of STDs. The Chairman (Mao), and the Premier (Zhou Enlai) may be gone, but I'm still here, so is Comrade Chen Yun and so many old comrades. How could we bury with our own hands the Socialism that was built upon the sacrifices of countless martyrs? Practice will verify the truth. Nothing I say matters. If the Reform reforms away Socialism, then I, Deng Xiaoping, will be judged guilty by history.[/FONT]
It's a shame that everything comrade Chen Yun dreamed about has came about (truly insane how accurate his predictions were). Imo Deng had good intentions, he perhaps thought that he was doing a soviet style super nep in china. But without supervision its impossible to stop the corrupting force of unchecked capitalism from taking control. What can China do now? I have no idea.
DeleteIt's also interesting to note that Marx's original vision of how capitalism will play out in the west has also came about - rich getting richer, poor getting poorer.