Zhou loses control to Mao....
Something happened to Zhou. The Great Zhou En Lai.
Administrator Supreme. Father of China's Intelligence service, along with the
founder of a major Chinese newspaper. Cold blooded killer.
Druglord.
How did someone so capable and
invaluable to the Rise of China so willingly fall into line behind Mao?
Zhou EnLai continues to
"flaunt" his ability after the end of the Long March. He serves
in Chongqing, as liaison between the CCP and KMT. He was ripe for
becoming a paid American spy(or someone's spy) but never bit. Chiang Kai
Shek could only dream of Zhou turning, like so many others before him.
Zhou's passion for the cause
was unstoppable. His reputation unscathed and beyond reproach.
The mantle of leadership within
the Chinese Communist Party was his for the asking. There is no way Mao
could have become Supreme Leader of China if not for Zhou's acquiescence.
Zhou need simply raise his voice, flash his passion for the cause, and
the chair would be his.
The leadership of China at that
time was full of people that had known Zhou long before they had known
Mao. Lin Biao, Deng Xiaoping, Ye Jianying.
And yet Mao took control.
Mao had cred. He
did. Passion. Experience. Hadn't he lost a wife to the
KMT? And a brother?
Still, to conclude one last
time upon a point there is no need to further make, Zhou was debonair, and well-traveled.
He had spoken to the laowai on their terms, in their land. He had seen
Paris and London. The Eiffel Tower and Big Ben. Red Square!
The Imperial Palace in Tokyo.
How many people, let alone
fellow Communist Comrades would have so willingly stepped aside?
I venture none.
And Mao? If he wore
Zhou's boots, would he have stepped aside? Of course not!
The West no doubt preferred
Zhou. He was more handsome than Mao. Fit the caricature we
ourselves have of what a leader should look like. Our mold. Our
stereotype. Mao did not. Did Mao deserve a leadership role
after the Long March concluded? Of course he did.
Zhou's top military adviser
perhaps?
What base did Mao even
have? He had a wife that got pregnant along the retreat. Indeed she
suffered over 10 shrapnel fragments in her body during an attack. Why
does it seem it was always Mao's wives and their sacrifice making him so
famous? Why did they suffer more than he?
I want to examine how far Mao
rose and how "far" Zhou dropped. One man it seems didn't mind
the shadows in lieu of the limelight. And China paid the price.
I think the beginning of Zhou's
"fall" at the expense of Mao was when his role as CCP
"representative" within the KMT held areas begin. He was in
effect the CCP "Ambassador". As I alluded to earlier, he
was a smashing success. The CCP's chief "PR MAN" if you
will. Using his charm to not only mesmerize the local diplomatic corps
but the KMT leadership as well. Indeed, if Chiang Kai Shek had made one
miscalculation more than others, it was that he refused to have Zhou Enlai
killed.
CKS's relationship with Zhou
perhaps simply went back too far. And Zhou basically helped to spare
CKS's life when he was taken hostage by Marshall Zhang in 1936.
Still, like with Zhou and Mao,
the difference between Chiang Kai Shek and Zhou was great. CKS's wife
would have been much better suited to be Zhou's wife, Song Mei Ling.
Still, Song Mei Ling marrying that Great Incompetent CKS was like feeding
Lobster and Caviar to a baby. They were indeed as unsuitable for
each other as an American Cadillac engine in a Pinto.
The 1930's were a critical time
for the CCP. Without the successful PR of Zhou Enlai, and his ability to mingle
with both the Western and KMT leadership within China, the CCP would have
remained a mystery. An impenetrable political body impossible to
study or learn from. Much harder to understand its goals or mission
within China.
Thanks to Song Mei Ling,
EVERYONE knew about China, albeit from the KMT perspective. The KMT was
thus able to control the narrative for the longest time. Without Zhou
around, that narrative would have lasted even longer.
But while Zhou was away, surely
he knew Mao would leverage this opportunity to solidify his power over the
Chinese Communist Party, and at Zhou's expense. And this is what
exactly happened.
Zhou En Lai's return to Yanan
marked the end of his overall dominance of the Communist Party, and of most of
his decision making influence. But I don't think he cared. The record is
clear; Zhou went along with every single decision of Mao's; from
the destruction of Beijing's ancient city walls up to the Cultural
Revolution. There is simply no reliable record of his opposing Mao in any
public way.
What of Mao's record during his
control of the Jiangxi Soviet? Whitewashed.
A decision that to this day
still confuses me, is how Mao and Zhou and America could have held so many,
many intimate discussions in both Yanan and Chongqing from the 30's through to
the late 40's, to nearly 1947, and yet be at war only a few years later.
How does that happen?
Meanwhile, as Zhou was away in
Chongqing, so were the generals in the field. Who was to oppose Mao?
My take is Zhou simply saw the
writing on the wall. And lacked the personality to fight back. This
also tells one something of Zhou En Lai's wife. For if she felt her
husband was being slighted, she without question would have egged Zhou
on. Indeed, Zhou's return to Yanan was nothing but a confirmation of
Mao's coronation as Emperor, and Zhou's relegation to Joker Status.
Could Zhou have beaten the KMT
if he were in charge? I stated earlier, in the beginning of this series,
that no he could not. But now I wonder. Chiang Kai Shek was that
corrupt, his generals so out for themselves, that I think now the answer is
Yes, Zhou could've have indeed defeated Chiang Kai Shek. The KMT armies
without a doubt simply felt their life in China would be better fighting for
the CCP, than for CKS.
It is similar to the US Presidency. Very rarely does a Zhou type person (qualified but with a reserved personality) get elected. Probably the only one in recent times, was George HW Bush. Everyone else, Reagan, Clinton, W Bush, Obama, and Trump were not qualified but got to the top by rousing certain groups in the US to get them elected.
ReplyDeleteMao was obviously much better in the PR department than Zhou, especially in relation to the peasantry. So its not really a surprise that he won.
Zhou has been viewed more positively in the West mainly because he tried to soften the nastiness of the Culture Revolution. It is doesn't take too much to look good during such turbulent times.
Mao was indeed much better in the "peasant dept", which I think scared everybody else, especially during the pivotal Lushan Conference. Your views on Zhou are of course correct. He did try and soften the hard jagged edges of Chinese society during the 60's. More on him in just a bit....
ReplyDelete