One of China's Own raises a big stink.... Part 1
(I'll get the rest of this out asap....didn't want what I have already written to sit around, so I just decided to put it out now as Part 1)
In 1862 Abraham Lincoln met Harriet Beecher Stowe, the
author of Uncle Tom’s Cabin. It was
already one of the biggest selling books in America. At the time of their meeting, his initial
remarks to the diminutive Ms. Stowe were,
“So you’re the little lady that started this war.”
So can be said of Chai Jing, a remarkably talented and
charming investigative reporter in China(they do exist). Her tome Under the Dome will probably when an
Oscar for best foreign documentary next year, and if it doesn’t I’m sure a lot of
questions will be asked. Originally a 4
hour long epic(that I’d love to see in its entirety, as I’ve read the original
is far more biting), this documentary is something all people interested in not
just China, but World Health must watch.
While it took me 4 or 5 sittings to finish it, it is well worth the
effort. It is a modern day version of River Elegy, another documentary on
China, by Chinese, that must be watched as well (that sadly almost no Chinese
will ever see).
So who the hell is Chai Jing, and why should we care?
The only thing worth knowing is that she is from within the
system. She is not an outsider. Only someone with her background and national
recognition could have gained the access required to the officials necessary to
make her points relevant. And the fact
she is a charming lady did not hurt her cause.
Chai Jing is the perfect foil to the opaque nature of not just
China’s Governing Machinery, but to the unchallenged consequences of China’s
Unaccountable Decision Making Power as well.
Because of her prestige, and knowledge of the system, she was wise
enough to actually get her script approved from the State before actually
showing it. In effect, she did everything
she was supposed to do.
And they still banned it.
One can say the supposed 150 million views of her documentary
only make up 12% of the population. And that
many folks with families and jobs simply cannot watch this in one sitting. Fair
enough. But what one must not discount is that without question this documentary
was watched not just by the powers that be, but also by China’s future leaders,
ie it’s educated youth. While the
Peasants are the class of people that will decide whether China slides into
eventual Chaos or not, it is the college educated youth this documentary was
clearly aimed at, and who will be the future managers and decision makers
of China’s Fate.
This documentary is her appeal to them.
China’s leader Xi is actually making a monumental blunder
not publicly espousing the benefits of this documentary. Like Kennedy during the Civil Rights Movement
of the 60’s, he’s looking the other way.
Or is he?
Xi knows damn well that if he publicly comes out and praises
this film, expectations towards solving this problem will increase
exponentially. Rather, he’s currently content
to sit on the laurels of his success as regards the anti-corruption campaign. Everyone in China is corrupt. It’s easy to arrest people and send them to
jail.
And JFK? He knew only
too well that his public support of Civil Rights for the Black Man would
endanger his political support in the “Solid South”. And as power in the Senate was controlled
by a bunch of old, condescending, racist Southern White Men anyway, who had absolutely
no fear of this “Boy”, JFK’s hands were literally tied.
All the same, Chai
Jing has unleashed a controversy that can neither be forgotten nor put back in
the can. If this was Russia, she’d
probably be assassinated. Never more
clearly has the divide between government policy and the consequences of that
policy been more stark. As I’ve said
before, the future of China is dependent upon the ability and courage of China’s
governmental mid managers.
They do all
the work. They create the laws. The wording.
They educate their bosses on what stance to take on policy. Their bosses in turn are usually just higher
ranking CCP officials that transfer around a lot. Not these guys. They study and learn policy. But there are two types of them today: those with courage that advocate the right
thing, and those that simply take the money and fend for themselves.
Comments
Post a Comment