Cixi Rules Until the End...
This is a simple post for people interested in China. Hopefully, this will inspire my readers’ to
read more Chinese History. There’s some
good stuff tucked away in those 5000 years.
(just sayin’) The only thing
equivalent to the stories and lessons learned Chinese History is The Bible. It is interesting to note at the time of
the Death of Christ, China already had at least 30 million people. Jerusalem at most 70,000 people. China’s biggest city meanwhile, Changan, “only”
had 300,000 people.
I think up to now we’ve seen Cixi for what she really was
during the first half of her reign: an
uber competent person, stuck in an era nearly all Chinese Emperor’s throughout
history were able themselves to avoid.
An era they had no control over.
An era where they were unable to control the narrative. A time in Chinese History where they were
forced to be reactive rather than proactive.
An era for which the Emperor of
China rarely had to worry about any direct competitor. A time
when events moved so quickly China itself for the first time ever was not able
to manipulate or slow down events to suit its own purposes.
I am certain nearly any Emperor facing the same challenges
Cixi had on her plate would have done no better. And most likely would have led China to
suffer the same fate. The fate of being
overpowered by other nations. Still as
we shall see, there is no question towards the end of her reign many of China’s
troubles were directly of her own doing.
From the last year of Daoguang’s reign in 1850, followed by
Xianfeng, whose reign ended in 1861, to the new kid on the block, Tongzhi,
whose reign officially took place in 1861, but really didn’t take power until
1873, China’s quick succession of inexperienced leaders without question
weakened the country. The lack of
continuity weakened China’s message to the World.
If there ever was a time for continuity, for a strong
leader, this was it. China had shown to
the world the chinks in its armor. The
West was ready to pounce. Still, despite
the uncertainty within China, Cixi was always there. She was the hand that kept the helm straight.
The power behind the curtain. Could the 8 Regents have done any better? Not if they did not speak with one voice.
In 1873, the wait was over, and the Tongzhi Emperor formally
took over as the Emperor of China.
During Tongzhi’s youth what had been going on in China?
Sticking to her “reformist” ways, Cixi had implemented a
series of reforms and improvements that became known as the “Tongzhi
Restoration”. Remember, it was at this
time Japan was also undergoing its own Meiji Restoration, learning from the
West to make Japan strong. This Japanese
Restoration succeeded beyond its wildest dreams, at great expense to China and
the rest of Asia, up to 1945.
This was China’s last great opportunity to quite frankly, “pull
its self together”. To reform
itself. Yes, there would be another
time, but by then it would be much too late.
By then China would be in a near death spiral.
And Tongzhi himself had nothing to do with this reformation,
for obvious reasons, his youth. The
main takeaway from this effort was simple; while China put on a great show of
cosmetic reform, all change is not really such if the thinking of the regime
from top down does not itself drive the effort.
As such, the Tongzhi Restoration was really nothing but a
restoration of the old ways. An
affirmation of that classic phrase, “the more things change, the more they stay
the same”.
Without knowing it, by the time the so called “Restoration”
petered out, China was a dead man walking.
Unless the Tongzhi Emperor could come to the rescue, that is.
And why couldn’t he?
All his life China had waited patiently for him to come of age. He had a very good education. Cixi thought she had prepared him well.
I will not speak much here of Tongzhi’s supposedly good
preparation for ruling China. Did he
speak a foreign language (like all my bad ass readers do!)
Did he have much interaction with non Chinese? Did he travel
abroad?
Somehow, despite his first class upbringing, Tongzhi
infamously grew up to be a very unimpressive individual. Immature, and all to ready to use his power,
even abuse it.
One thing that comes to mind is the obvious comparison
between Tongzhi’s penchant for firing experienced leaders and North Korea’s
present day leader, Kim Jung Un. For instance,
both leaders had a habit of getting rid of far more experienced advisors,
usually relatives. Not long after taking
power Tongzhi for example in one short fiery outburst basically stripped all
his Uncles of power. Kim Jung Un
notoriously killed his.
To be fair, the Chinese Emperor himself was only 17. And more likely than not he probably would
have grown out of his adolescent behavior and his superior education would have
eventually taken over. Think of Kangxi. Emperor of China for 61 years. Was Kangxi really that much better of an
emperor at the age of 17 than Tongzhi?
Still, all Tongzhi needed to do was stay alive for a few
solid years. Get China back on the
right track. Remind the world of her
strength and power and historical influence.
And the more sure footed he became in his position, the less power Cixi
herself would also have.
It is important to remind readers that Cixi was at this
stage basically retired…or perhaps we should say “retiring”.
Was she still the power behind the throne? Sort of.
She still called the shots, but only for a little while longer. It was inevitable that Tongzhi, a strong
personality, would take over. Even more
so, Cixi would have little grounds for keeping her visibility. She would be expected to ….disappear. As such, I believe Cixi fully expected to “fade
away”. Why wouldn’t she expect her son
to live a long life? Perhaps reign for
decades!
Now there are a few more things one must know of this guy; he
loved his sex, and he loved his wife, the Empress Jiashun.
I bring the former up purely because Tongzhi has
historically been believed to have died of syphilis. Others believe he died of smallpox. Yet if the former is true, it would be
because the Jiashun Empress and Cixi simply did not get along. It is here we
really begin to understand the brutal application of Cixi’s power during this
timeframe. Cixi was seemingly quite unhappy with her son’s
lack of a serious approach to ruling as Emperor, and in a show of power, thus
ordered Tongzhi separated from his wife, Jiashun. To her credit, the capable person she was,
she full well understood the energy and attention to detail needed to “run” a
kingdom.
And Tongzhi was lacking.
Perhaps we will deal with Tongzhi in another post someday,
but Jiashun obviously did not count on Her Man dying so soon, or else why go
out of one’s way to piss off Cixi? It’s
one thing to not get along with one’s mother inlaw. But when your mother in law has shown the
ability to put people to death, and is the leader of China, shouldn’t you give
a little more slack than one might to the average mother in law? Jiashun obviously thought she could outlast
the “old lady”.
Jiashun, her inability to "strategically" get along with Cixi was no doubt her undoing.
What was the end result of all this?
Once Tongzhi was physically kept from his own wife, the
eunuchs got in his ear and mentioned the Beijing Brothels. Tongzhi took a liking to these
brothels. Not long after he died. (But historians
now believe he died of smallpox.)
Upon Tongzhi’s death Cixi and Ci’an again took the reins of
power. This time for good.
And what of Jiashun?
Rumor had it she was pregnant.
She died a few months later.
Conveniently removing another rival of power from within the Forbidden
City. Cixi most certainly had her disposed of.
Poisoned perhaps?
What if Jiashun had a son?
Upon having a son, would not Jiashun also become the Empress Dowager?
By the time of Tongzhi’s untimely death, Cixi was barely
39. If by now only she believed she
could “save” China, in my view the answer would be “Correct”.
Cixi’s next challenge was to name a successor. Whether there was a “man” able enough,
experienced enough, to “run” China was not the point. Here again Chinese “tradition” proved to be
its undoing. By killing Jiashun, Cixi
had seen to it that no “direct line” to succession could be possible. Cixi simply could not live with Jiashun
trying to usurp her on the throne of China.
If Cixi had allowed Jiashun to live, if Jiashun had indeed borne the
late Emperor a son, there is the strong possibility that Civil War would have
commenced within a short time.
Jiashun obviously would have worked to have Cixi banished
from the Capital.
No, she had to go. Grandson
or no, it is my belief Cixi simply could not endure to live a life that saw her
grow weaker and Jiashun stronger by the day.
While I am tempted to blame Chinese Imperial “Tradition” for
what happened next, one must admit other European dynasties probably had the
same custom. Ie no older generation
could replace a younger generation at the throne. As such, Prince Gong could not rule. Nor could any of the other brothers of the
Xianfeng Emperor. China’s future leader
must come from either the current or future generation. All the same, this gave Cixi more time on the
throne. More time to even further
centralize her rule.
The person Cixi chose was the ill-fated Guangxu. At the age of 18, a year older than Tongzhi
when he became Emperor, Guangxu became ruler of China. The year was 1889. And once again, Cixi “retired”.
Guangxu
Guangxu has been on my list of posts for quite some
time. He deserves his own post. But Cixi’s final legacy simply cannot be
written without mentioning Guangxu.
I’ve gotten away without mentioning the Taiping Rebellion. But I cannot do the same with Guangxu.
He was the nephew of Cixi.
The son of Prince Chun, himself the younger brother of Xianfeng. Guangxu was also the son of Cixi’s
sister. He was properly educated, lived
a long time, and was less careless then Tongzhi. Further, despite the repeated stereotype many
have of Cixi as a power hungry and ruthless manipulator behind the curtain, she
actually gave Guangxu a lot of leeway. Until
she didn’t.
So what happened?
I think the biggest issue with Guangxu is he had no memory
of the Opium Wars. Or of China as a
Great Power. Rather, he was involved
with the West from the very beginning. He was simply born in times of great upheaval
and disarray. No new Chinese Leader
could have succeeded. And he was always
in the shadow of The Great Cixi.
One here begins to see Cixi as tired. Spending most of her time secluded away from
the Forbidden City. Seemingly nonchalant
as China is slowly consumed one port and land grab at a time. Having seen this game playout, she seems void
of any sense of urgency. No doubt she
pondered how China had come to this. How
China had changed from 1851 to now, nearly forty years later.
Guangxu has a better temperament than Tongzhi. A better sense of awareness. Perhaps this is what kept Cixi at ease. Events however, led Guangxu towards radical
change. The Japanese had given China a
good licking, once again exposing China as nothing but a Paper Dragon. Indeed, it was clear while reforms in China
were haphazard at best, the problem with China was its society was simply too
big to change. China had never adopted
any real governmental reforms. How
could China really change if power was top down, opaque, and in the hands of
one?
In 1898, Guangxu attempted a “crash” reform. It was this attempt at reform that begins to
give Cixi her bad name. While one blames Cixi, one must ask; shouldn’t
Guangxu have known better? Didn’t his
knowledge of Cixi tell him how ill-fated this attempt would have been? Shouldn’t he at least attempted to gain her
approval and support?
While some of his attempts at reform no doubt were harmless
(such as the establishment of a Naval Academy and agricultural schools), those
that directly challenged her well-earned prerogative to decide what was right
for China were not. By this time perhaps
Cixi was the only person alive in China’s Imperial Household that had ever
looked Xianfeng in the eyes. That knew
the Emperor. She had outwitted the
dimwitted Sushun. Outlasted Ci’an. Out maneuvered Prince Gong.
Sacrificed allies, executed others.
Nevermind what was right or wrong, dammit. She had earned the right to maintain power!
Cixi, with the help of Yuan Shikai’s betrayal of Guangxu,
stopped the movement. Nevermind how she
treated Guangxu in future, by stopping the reforms of the young Emperor, she
had shown her hand as a leader of the world’s largest nation, mentally ill
equipped for change. And I think in hindsight
credit must be given for her point of view.
We seem to forget that Beijing was not a microcosm of
Chinese Society at the time. While one
could see more and more Chinese intent on changing China, on modernizing China,
one must not forget that the real China lay only a few miles beyond the
Forbidden City’s gates. Confucianism
reign supreme. China was too big to
change, let alone within 100 days. The
daring of Cixi cum 1861, the Manchu Concubine with the audacity to stage a coup
against the Xianfeng Regency was simply not the seasoned, content Cixi of
1898.
Still ruthless, like most older folks, she simply feared
Change. And she knew China was not ready
for change.
Thus she cast Guangxu aside. Cixi no doubt often wondered why the young
Emperor simply threw it all away……?
“All this could’ve been yours”, I’m sure she often wondered,
“If you’d just slowed down and minded your place.”
However, for much of China’s officialdom, I’m quite sure her
move was a popular move. Afterall, she surrounded herself with people
that thought like her.
In 1898, the culmination of drought, Western missionaries
and unemployed youth jelled to form the all too familiar refrain of
xenophobia. This is my simple
explanation of the cause of the Boxer Movement. And it is here where Cixi is most
remembered, though believe it or not, she does even dumber things to ruin her reputation
in the future.
To the Chinese, this was nothing if not just another
drought, another rebellion. Another cultish
society formed from ignorance and superstition. However, their attacking and murdering of Westerners
changed things for China. As such, with
Westerners involved, events could no longer simply called an internal
matter. And as such, China lost the
ability to control the narrative.
Cixi declared war on all Westerners in China. She felt the Chinese Han would rise up. They did not.
It was an incredible gamble but Cixi had numbers on her side. It failed and Cixi had to sneak out of
Beijing dressed as a peasant. One cannot
blame Cixi for thinking numbers were on her side. One can blame her for thinking the West would
just wilt away. China simply offered too
much opportunity for too many Western Adventurers to leave China alone.
Among the interesting decisions was the one made by Yuan
Shikai. The man who betrayed Guangxu,
and henceforth a strong ally of Cixi’s. He
thought it over and came to the conclusion the Boxers were more of a threat to
his power and influence than the Barbarian.
He attacked the Boxers and killed thousands.
Yuan Shikai. Ruthless, Cixi's kind of man.
But ambitious and self serving.
The end of the Boxer Rebellion eventually cost China 600
million taels of silver. That is, the foolhardy
decision of one person to declare war on the West caused China great financial
hardship.
One can argue from a financial
basis, China was financially crippled from this decision to declare war on the
laowai, until the rule of Deng Xiaoping.
So what did Cixi do? Returning
to Beijing she had no choice but to reform China, as fast as possible, before
the next damn war. The only problem was
she was already an entire generation behind the Japanese.
If one remembers part one, did not the Chinese believe Japan
would be their biggest threat? They were
right. Alas, she was way too late. China’s procrastination at the top, along
with the influence of the Confucian Class, sentenced China to humiliation and
occupation, until 1949. More so than
any British Fleet ever could have accomplished on its own.
But Cixi had one last act of cruelty to allow us to remember
her by. Sensing, either wrongly or
rightly (probably rightly), that Guangxu would regain power upon her death and
change Chinese Policy contrary to her wishes she had him poisoned with arsenic. That is, she killed him out of spite.
He was
only 37 when he died.
What if Guangxu had lived?
Would China have continued its downward spiral into a
country divided by warlords and Japanese domination? Would we ever know of Mao and Chiang Kai
Shek?
Would China have finally had its own restoration? Perhaps the “Guangxu Restoration”?
And not for the last time, “the terrible ifs accumulate”.
Cixi is quite an interesting character in history. In East Asia she is viewed much more sympathetically than in West where she is the Evil Dowager. I remember watching a historical drama 5-10 years ago. It was a joint Sino-Japanese production and the actress playing Cixi was an older Japanese actress. Basically Cixi was portrayed as trying to save the Qing Dynasty and the Manchus. There was a good deal of discussion about the animosity between the Hans and the Manchus even after 250 years of Manchu rule. This point is almost totally missed in the Western view on Cixi. No doubt Cixi was brutal towards individuals in the Imperial court particularly younger females but this was par the course in Chinese Imperial history. However, the Western portrayals focus too much on the Boxer Rebellion, which was basically a quixotic hope for a native rebellion which just showed how out of touch Cixi and the Imperial court was at that time. Of course, the thing that really caused the Qing to eventually fall was the earlier Taiping rebellion which they never recovered from. Of course, this is glossed over in the Chinese view of history since its inconveniently points the finger to internal reasons for Chinese weakness instead of the preferred Western Barbarians at Gate View. Chinese history has other examples of this like the An Lushan Rebellion during the Tang Dynasty. Anyway, looking forward to your articles on Jiang Qing
ReplyDeleteThank you much for your thoughts on the matter. I think you made a pretty damn good point regarding the Taiping Rebellion. With all situations, nations, and in particular China, it is all about controlling the narrative, which China has succeeded in doing far beyond anyone's expectations.
ReplyDeleteYou are correct...I did not dwell much on the tension between the Han and the Manchu's. I just haven't heard much about it. Keep up the comments!
The book 'Emperess Dowager Cixi' by Jung Chang paints her much more sympathetically than you have written. I knew nothing about her except some vague idea that she was known as somehow evil or cruel.
ReplyDeleteThe book might be worth a read for you, as the author seems to have researched quite extensively and provides a better light to judge her actions by.
Thank you for your comment. Yes, Jung Chang is quite famous. I read her first book Wild Swans over twenty years ago. I was tempted to read her book on Cixi, but after the massive blowback she received from historians regarding her biography of Mao I begged Off. She is not very pro China. As such, I just can't believe she is welcome in China when it comes to research for her books.
ReplyDelete