All that Chinese and Korean History....
There has been much ado and even more indignation regarding
Chinese-Korean history, ie the supposed Chinese dominance of Korea throughout
the centuries. Much of it from the
Korean side.
Well, I’m a few weeks late to this party, but I’m here to
say sorry folks, it’s pretty straight forward and not at all pretty. So let’s just ask one question:
Who paid tribute to whom?
And that should answer the question.
The Chinese thoroughly dominated Korea for hundreds of
years, and if you don’t want to believe any certain individual stating as such,
please see above.
The Han ruled North Korea for 400 years.
Nevermind the Qing dominance of Korea. The Joseon dynasty that ruled for over 500
years, from 1392 to 1910 actually began paying tribute to the Ming in
1401. Basically right away. That is, to shore up the stability of his
newfound dynasty, the first true king Taejo found it more important to “pay off”
his powerful Northern neighbor than he did to immediately quell internal
dissent. After all, paying off China
gave him free rein to do as he pleased internally.
When the Qing came to power, the Koreans inexplicably refused
to pay tribute to China. Most unwise. After running roughshod through Korea, the
Joseon quickly came to its senses and reestablished a tributary relationship
with China.
Meanwhile, who was China paying tribute to?
Quick segue way here, that is perhaps why much of Asia
showed little if any sympathy for China’s troubles during the 19th
century. To them it was comeuppance pure
and simple.
As late as the first decade of the 20th century
the Chinese put up a fight in Korea. Not
for altruistic reasons, or something as benign as “let’s help a buddy out”, but
because to the Qing, Korea was within their well established and unchallenged
sphere of influence.
And it was unchallenged.
For the longest damn time, until 1895.
The cruelest of ironies is the forced opening of Japan to America
in the 1850’s. Up until that timeframe
Japan had closed itself of from the world.
Indeed there was a time in history when both China and Japan both
concurrently had the same policy.
One country opens up.
Learns how backward it has become.
Prospers due to Free Trade. Than uses
its newfound power to bully the rest of Asia.
I need to remind myself we are talking of Japan here.
This unwelcome kicking open of the door of Japan’s isolation
by America indirectly led to China’s loss of Korea as part of its sphere of
influence.
Meanwhile back to China:
If Korea was not defacto part of China’s kingdom, why did China fight so
hard to “keep it”? Only the forceful
attack of Japan against Korea in 1894 brought about the end of modern day Chinese
domination of Korea.
Korea is right to be nationalistic in its approach to
China. Many Chinese still want to even reclaim
Vladivostok. Many Chinese openly dream
of having Asia submit to its historical role of submission. It is their own version
of Manifest Destiny. This is another
reason why China really does not want Korea unified. Because it very much likes the fact that
North Korea is dependent upon China. Call
it historical nostalgia. And well, a
unified Korea would simply be too independent.
Nevermind the probability that American troops would most likely finally
be able to return home and close all those bases.
Korea however, has really only now enjoyed true independence
for the first time in 600 years. Can one
really blame it for its own sensitivity towards outsiders? Especially China, with whom it can rightly blame
for its failure to unify Korea. It is
unfortunate that North Korea is still reliant upon China. Yes, South Korea is reliant to a degree upon
America, but not in any economic sense compared to the North Korean-Chinese
relationship.
Meanwhile, can we not show a tinge of sympathy for
China? It certainly did not plan on
having to support North Korea like it has.
With the passing of time, one can certainly challenge Mao for his
decision to go into North Korea. Not only
did he gain a liability, he also lost the far more important prize of Taiwan.
Truman, a legendary detector of bullshit, properly called
out the corrupt and incompetent Chiang Kai Shek for what he really was, a
murderous son of a bitch, maybe even a minor Chinese version of Stalin. Complemented by his scheming silver tongued
wife. Alas Mao badly misplayed his
hand. Mao was no diplomat. I’m sure he rather would have preferred
regaining Taiwan rather than creating a welfare state on his border. If only he could’ve read the future!
Comments
Post a Comment